The Chinese Guest

Most hotels don't have a China problem. They have a conversion problem.

$85 billion of Chinese outbound spend goes to accommodation this year. Whether any of it reaches your property is decided on a Ctrip page most Western commercial teams have never read.

175M
Chinese outbound trips forecast for 2026
$85B
Of that spend going to accommodation
50%
Traveling independently, not in groups
72%
Using AI tools to plan trips

Sources: Skift and China Trading Desk, Future Market Insights, China Trading Desk. Reviewed August 2026.

The audit

Four things I read before anyone mentions a campaign

Your Ctrip reviews, as social proof

Where a Chinese guest decides whether you're worth $400 a night, even when they intend to book direct.

The score gap

4.3 on Ctrip against 4.7 on TripAdvisor points to a service gap your English reviews never show you.

Your Ctrip and Fliggy listings

Read the way a Chinese guest reads them, not the way a translation tool renders them.

Your competitive set

How the property two streets away converts the same demand you're seeing.

What a score gap looks like
Review score comparison, Ctrip against TripAdvisor An illustrative property scores 4.7 on TripAdvisor and 4.3 on Ctrip, a gap of 0.4. 3.8 4.2 4.6 5.0 TripAdvisor 4.7 Ctrip 4.3 0.4 Illustrative. Same property, same period, two review populations.
Three themes drive most of a gap like this, and they appear almost only in the Chinese reviews: Mandarin-speaking service, service speed, and service recovery. None of it ruins the trip. All of it shows up in the score.
The overlooked one

Your property is being recommended, or not, by an AI you've never used

72% of Chinese travelers now plan with AI tools. Ask Ctrip's assistant and it answers from Ctrip's data. Ask Doubao the same question and we've watched it come back with TripAdvisor ratings instead. Different models, different sources, no published rules, and almost nobody testing it.

We run the queries your guests are running, across the models they're actually using, and show you what comes back for your property next to your competitive set.

How it works

Diagnosis first. Execution only where the diagnosis calls for it.

Stage one

The audit

Fixed scope, fixed fee. A prioritized list of what to fix and in what order. Some properties take it away and run it themselves, which is a fine outcome.

Stage two

Execution, if you want it

Our Guangzhou team runs Xiaohongshu, Douyin and Ctrip channel work. The difference is that we know what we're building before we start.

How we measure results, and what we will and won't take credit for

Fit

Narrow work. It suits some properties and not others.

A good fit

  • Independent and owner-operated hotels and resorts, upper-upscale and above
  • Destinations with real Chinese demand: Southeast Asia, the Gulf, Europe
  • Owners and asset managers unhappy with how their operator performs in China

Not a fit

  • Brand-managed properties where the operator runs China and you're happy with it
  • Anyone who wants a channel opened this quarter without asking whether it's the right one
  • Destinations with no Chinese demand. I can't create a market that isn't there.
Who's behind it

Ivan Lam

Nine years in travel technology and consulting, on reviews, inbound FIT demand and paid acquisition for Shangri-La, Accor, Starwood and mid-sized Asian groups. Since then, two years running e-commerce on Xiaohongshu, Douyin and Ctrip, where conversion gets measured daily rather than reported quarterly.

Nine years living in Shanghai. I read your Chinese reviews in Chinese. I work from Hong Kong, with a team in Guangzhou handling execution inside the market. Full background on LinkedIn.

Send me the property. I'll tell you what I see.

The property name and destination is enough to start. Scope and pricing depend on size and how many platforms you're live on.